Catalog Number SEPX-8-6-30-135 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
|
Patient Problems
Vasoconstriction (2126); Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688)
|
Event Date 10/04/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
The physician was attempting to use a protege rx stent with spider embolic protection to treat a 10 mm plaque lesion in the proximal common carotid artery.The artery was 6-7 mm in diameter and had moderate tortuosity.The lesion was not calcified.The devices were prepped and inspected as per the ifu with no issues identified.The lesion was not pre-dilated.The device did not pass through a previously deployed stent and the physician did not encounter resistance during advancement, no excessive force was used.It was reported that the protege rx stent opened partially and could not be deployed.The physician attempted to retrieve the spider and stent through the guidewire.During retrieval, the spider device was damaged and the vessel went into spasm.The patient was treated with vasodilators and the case was postponed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluation summary: the protégé rx device was returned for evaluation.The protégé rx stent delivery system was received without a stent.Within its shelf carton, the device was in its transportation tray.No cines or procedure notes were returned for evaluation.The protégé rx was removed from the tray and noted the tuohy-borst valve was loose and could be tightened.The deployment paddle was approximately 95mm from the tuohy borst valve cap.The protégé rx stent delivery system was received without a stent.The retainer was present with no abnormalities observed.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|