It was reported that a left hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision, the r3 liner, hemi head & modular sleeve were removed.The stem & r3 shell remained implanted.As of today, device return and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.Review of manufacturing records did not reveal any waivers, concessions, manufacturing or material abnormalities that could have contributed to this issue.The available medical documents were reviewed.It should be noted patient has a history of falls.The iliopsoas abscess was without joint involvement and a physicians note indicated the patient had sepsis with uti that may have seeded into the pelvic and iliacus muscle.As well, the muscle repair.Intraoperative report indicated the anterolateral approach was used, which subsequently led to insufficiency of the abductor mechanism.Therefore it cannot be determined the detachment of the gluteus medius and minimus tendons are related to a failure of the medical device.The pain, brown tissue, cyst, as well as the pathological finding of chronic inflammation are consistent with findings associated with a pseudotumor.However, without the supporting lab results, imaging, or the analysis of the explanted components, the root cause cannot be confirmed.Further, it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|