• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number ESS305
Device Problems Difficult to Insert (1316); Difficult to Remove (1528); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This spontaneous case was reported by a physician (b)(6) and describes the occurrence of complication of device removal ("removal was difficult as the insert was stuck in the uterine tube"), the first episode of device deployment issue ("the insert was not released because the thumb-wheel became jammed for three inserts during three procedures"), the second episode of device deployment issue ("the insert was not released because the thumb-wheel became jammed for three inserts during three procedures") and the third episode of device deployment issue ("the insert was not released because the thumb-wheel became jammed for three inserts during three procedures") in a female patient who had essure (batch no.623833) inserted.Other product or product use issues identified: device difficult to use "removal was difficult as the insert was stuck in the uterine tube" (seriousness criterion medically significant) in 2007.On (b)(6) 2007, the patient had 3 attempts to have essure inserted.During these attempts, she experienced device deployment issue ("the insert was not released because the thumb-wheel became jammed for three inserts during three procedures").In addition, during one of these insertion attempts, she experienced device difficult to use and complication of device removal ("removal was difficult as the insert was stuck in the uterine tube").At the time of the report, the complication of device removal and the last episode of device deployment issue outcome was unknown.The reporter provided no causality assessment for complication of device removal, the first episode of device deployment issue, the second episode of device deployment issue and the third episode of device deployment issue with essure.Quality-safety evaluation of ptc: unable to confirm complaint.Most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on 13-oct-2017: quality safety evaluation of ptc.The list of similar cases contains essure reports received by bayer and older cases received by conceptus with similar events coded in meddra.In this particular case a search in the database was performed on 16-oct-2017 for the following meddra preferred term: device difficult to use - the analysis in the global safety database revealed 81 cases bayer is closely monitoring the benefit-risk profile of essure.A recent cumulative review of all available data on essure has not yielded any new safety signal with regard to this meddra pt.Incident.At the time of reporting, there is no evidence that a device-related defect or malfunction caused a death or serious injury.If additional information becomes available it will be provided on a supplemental report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ESSURE
Type of Device
TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, 13353
GM  13353
Manufacturer (Section G)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, 13353
GM   13353
Manufacturer Contact
k. shaw lamberson
100 bayer blvd, p.o. box 915
whippany, NJ 07981-0915
MDR Report Key7012776
MDR Text Key91437791
Report Number2951250-2017-06328
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HHS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
P020014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,o
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/09/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/09/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberESS305
Device Lot Number623833
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/13/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-