• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMERIEUX, INC VITEK® 2 GP TEST KIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMERIEUX, INC VITEK® 2 GP TEST KIT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 21342
Device Problem Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/04/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
A customer in germany notified biomerieux of a misidentification of a streptococcus pasteuri patient isolate in association with vitek 2 gp id test kit (ref (b)(4), lot 2420330113).Per the customer, this patient was very ill when hospitalized.Endocarditis was suspected; therefore, a blood culture was done.On (b)(6) 2017, vitek 2 2 gp (lot 2420352403) identified the isolate from this patient's blood culture as streptococcus gallolyticus ssp pasteurianus.On (b)(6) 2017, the strain was sent out to be confirmed via sequencing method (16s rdna sequencing).The strain was confirmed as streptococcus pasteuri.On (b)(6) 2017, the patient expired due to gastrointestinal bleeding.The customer stated that there was no incorrect treatment.The patient was treated for endocarditis and received the usual treatment given for streptococci.The treatment was not dependent on the species.The customer stated that there was no delay in treatment or harm to the patient due to this discrepant result.On (b)(6) 2017, the customer repeated the test with vitek 2 gp (lot 2420330113) as part of the investigation, and obtained the same misidentification result.A biomerieux internal investigation will be initiated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A customer in (b)(6) had notified biomérieux of a misidentification result when testing on two different lots of vitek® 2 gp id cards (2420352403 and 24203301133).Vitek 2 identified the strain as streptococcus gallolyticus ssp pasteruianus.The strain was confirmed as streptococcus pasteuri via 16s rdna sequencing method.An internal biomérieux investigation was performed.The customer did not submit the strain for further evaluation.This organism, streptococcus pasteuri, is not claimed for the vitek 2 gp id test kit.After research by the r&d strain collection department, it was determined that the species streptococcus pasteuri is not recognized by the taxonomy validation committee, so it is absent in lpsn, dsmz.In the ncbi taxonomy, the species is listed but with the comment "unpublished name", only the species s.Pasteurianus is cited.According to these elements, it is considered that there was no misidentification on the vitek 2 gp id card.The vitek 2 gp id cards performs as intended.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITEK® 2 GP TEST KIT
Type of Device
VITEK® 2 GP TEST KIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMERIEUX, INC
595 anglum road
st. louis MO 63042
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMERIEUX, INC
595 anglum road
st. louis MO 63042
Manufacturer Contact
ellen weltmer
595 anglum road
st. louis, MO 63042
3147317301
MDR Report Key7029296
MDR Text Key93107014
Report Number1950204-2017-00379
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
C1 EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/12/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/14/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number21342
Device Lot Number2420330113
Other Device ID Number03573026131920
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/19/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/22/2017
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-