• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES BRANDYWINE LUMB-EXTENSIONROD RAD 220 SIZ 11 TAN GOL; PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES BRANDYWINE LUMB-EXTENSIONROD RAD 220 SIZ 11 TAN GOL; PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 497.252
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).Patient code (b)(4) used for: the complaint indicated that the plate broke post-op which is likely to require additional surgical intervention.Subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.Investigation is ongoing; no conclusion could be drawn as product is entering the complaint system.Device history records review was conducted.The report indicates that the: part #497.252 / lot #5236987 manufacturing site: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: 26-jul-2006 no ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint action.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Device report from synthes on an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that the plate broke postoperatively on the first hole.No information about patient status.This complaint involves 1 part.Concomitant devices: unknown scews, qty/part/lot unknown.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated information added to complaint.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Update: 16.Nov.17.Due to investigators decision, the unknown rod will be added to the complaint since it is broken as well.This complaint involves 2 parts.This report is 1 of 2 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Update, dec.11, 2018: patient is a disabled kid.No further information is available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product development investigation was completed.The investigation summary indicates that: two lumbar extension rods broke postoperatively.The returned lumbar extension rods were examined and in each instance the complaint conditions were able to be confirmed as the rods were broken at the first hold in each instance.Additionally the first rod (497.252 lot 5236987) was found to have been cut and the second rod (identified as 497.254 based on the number of holes) was found to have a secondary fracture on the rod segment.No definitive root cause was able to be determined with the provided information.The complaint conditions were unable to be replicated as due to post-manufacturing damage.Relevant drawings for the returned devices were reviewed (both current revision and from the time of manufacture): top-level; the design, materials and finishing processes were found to be appropriate for the intended use of this device.No dimensional analysis is applicable due to post-manufacturing damage.A device history review, including material and hardness reviews, was performed for the returned implant¿s lot number and no mrrs or complaint-related issues were identified with the lot number which may have contributed to the complaint condition.No device history review was able to be completed on the second lumbar extension rod as the lot number is unknown; material and hardness review is not applicable for this device as there is no indication that material specifications contributed to the reported complaint condition of broken postoperatively.During the investigation no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.A visual inspection, drawing review, device history review, complaint history review and risk assessment review were performed as part of this investigation.This complaint is confirmed.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUMB-EXTENSIONROD RAD 220 SIZ 11 TAN GOL
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
michael cote
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key7041447
MDR Text Key92467318
Report Number2530088-2017-10339
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MDI
UDI-Device Identifier07611819747623
UDI-Public(01)07611819747623(10)5236987
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K142587
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/25/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number497.252
Device Lot Number5236987
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/16/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/25/2017
Initial Date FDA Received11/17/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/16/2017
12/11/2017
01/10/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/11/2017
01/04/2018
01/15/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/26/2006
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-