• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS; NIP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS; NIP Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PAH131002E
Device Problem Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/24/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Imaging evaluation: the received angiographic image illustrating two (2) gore® viabahn® endoprostheses.The one (1) gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis appears to have a wire in situ.(b)(4).It was stated to gore that, after the hospital completed their investigations on the medical device, the remaining parts of the gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis will be available for gore for further evaluations.
 
Event Description
It was reported to gore that two gore® viabahn® endoprostheses were implanted reaching from the left subclavian and jugular vein to the innominate vein in a parallel fashion.Reportedly, the first gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis was inserted through a 12fr introducer sheath and advanced over a 0.035 guidewire.Access was gained through the left femoral vein and the gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis was successfully implanted from left subclavian to the innominate vein.It was stated that following complete deployment the deployment line, the guidewire and the delivery system were intentionally not removed.Prior to the implant a stenosis within the left subclavian vein was predilated in presence of pacemaker electrode cables.The second gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis was inserted likewise through a 12fr introducer sheath and advanced over a 0.035 guidewire through the right femoral vein.In order to align the proximal portions of both gore® viabahn® endoprostheses the delivery system of this second device was slightly retracted.Following successful deployment the deployment line, the guidewire and the delivery system were successfully removed.However, when attempting to remove the deployment line of the first implanted endoprosthesis some resistance was experienced and it was not possible to pull the deployment line any further.It was suspected that the deployment line had been caught up at the second implanted gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis.Therefore, it was decided to cut off the deployment knob portion to gain access to the deployment line through the delivery system.Subsequently, a 6fr guiding catheter was inserted via the guidewire to reach the hub of the proximal portions of the endoprostheses in the left innominate vein and in order to pull the deployment line.However, the deployment line could not be removed.The physician elected to inflate a balloon inside the first endoprosthesis but a further deployment line removal attempt was also unsuccessful.The procedure concluded by cutting off the deployment line and closure of the access side.An echocardiography, which was performed 24 hours after the implant, indicated that the wire followed the blood flow, from the proximal portion of the endoprosthesis, implanted in the left innominate vein to superior vena cava, into the right atrium, tricuspid valve and right ventricle, just before pulmonary valve.The patient is doing well following the procedure and will be monitored.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Our engineers have evaluated the returned device.Their investigation showed following: a delivery catheter and a piece of deployment line were returned.The deployment knob and endoprosthesis were not returned.The deployment line was approximately 98 cm.One end appeared broken or cut and had 2 fibers that extended past the deployment line by 10 and 11.5 cm.This side of the deployment line appeared broken or cut.The other end appeared normal.The delivery catheter appeared unremarkable.Based on the device examination performed, no manufacturing anomalies were identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
NIP
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICAL ECHO RIDGE B/P
3250 w. kiltie lane
flagstaff AZ 86005
Manufacturer Contact
barbara ulrich
1500 n. 4th street
flagstaff, AZ 
9285263030
MDR Report Key7044629
MDR Text Key93567452
Report Number2017233-2017-00614
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PFV
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
P130006
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/07/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/20/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/29/2019
Device Catalogue NumberPAH131002E
Device Lot Number15963521
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/12/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/29/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age69 YR
-
-