• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION VERIFY; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION VERIFY; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3531
Device Problem Human-Device Interface Problem (2949)
Patient Problems Nerve Damage (1979); Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Pain (1994); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Urinary Retention (2119); Discomfort (2330); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Abdominal Distention (2601)
Event Date 10/27/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from the manufacturer¿s representative regarding a trial patient who was implanted for basic evaluation (be).It was reported that the trial patient felt pain in their back and spine.They noted they had a pinched nerve and took hydrocodone.Additional information received on oct.28 and 29, 2017 reported the patient was having trouble with the controller while attempting to increase the stimulation.Troubleshooting was performed (details not provided).The patient stated that increasing the stimulation caused pain but wanted to continue to increase it because they wanted it to work fast.They also noted they were not in as much pain since switching sides but reported they had not been seeing much improvement.In addition, the patient reported they had a tumor in their leg and had pain in the tumor from the stimulation.They also mentioned they felt bloated and had bleeding on the bandages.Further the patient stated that the procedure did not go well and the physician thought they may have nerve damage.The patient then changed sides from the left to the right.Follow up information received on oct.30, 2017 reported that since the patient had changed sides, they had been unable to void on their own.The patient also had a tumor on their hip and a pinched nerve so they were unsure where the pain was coming from.They stated that the pain was worse when the catheterized.Further the patient reported that the felt like their pinched nerved was ¿not accepted¿ the stimulation.It was noted that they switched back sides and the patient felt the stimulation in their tailbone at 0.2.Additional information received on oct.31, 2017, reported that the trial patient¿s controller kept turning off on its own.The patient also mentioned that they had been unable to void on their own so the stimulation was raised.They described the stimulation as a ¿pressure¿ in their lower back.Further information received on nov.1, 2017 reported that the patient thought the device had ¿backed her up¿ since they were unable to void.Also, the patient thought that something may have happened to the wire because they did not feel the stimulation right away while raising it.On nov.2.2017, the trial patient reported that there was still no progress made.There were no further complications reported or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the healthcare professional (hcp): the serial numbers were not available.The cause of the controller turning off on its own was attributed to user error and was not resolved.The hcp was unsure as to why the procedure did not go well and there was no confirmed issue with the lead wire.The hcp also reported that retention and urgency were the symptoms the trial was intended to treat, and retention was pre-existing.There were no further complications reported or anticipated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VERIFY
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7049640
MDR Text Key92656727
Report Number3007566237-2017-04911
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Patient
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/22/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/21/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Model Number3531
Device Catalogue Number3531
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/20/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age74 YR
Patient Weight57
-
-