The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint that the dilator would not fit over the wire was confirmed and the damage appeared to be use related.One 0.038¿ guidewire and one vessel dilator from an introducer were returned for investigation.The vessel dilator had been removed from the introducer sheath and the sheath was not returned for investigation.The guidewire was bent 19, 22, and 29 cm from the curve in the j-tip.Dislocations were observed in adjacent coils of the guidewire 0.3 and 1.6 cm from the distal weld tip.A functional test revealed that the proximal end of the guidewire passed through the entire dilator without any resistance until the dilator tip came in contact with the first bend in the wire.The dilator could not be advanced over the bent wire.The outside diameter (od) of the guidewire was measured with calipers and was found to be within specification.Since the damaged guidewire prevented advancement of the dilator, the complaint was determined to be use related since the guidewire had been removed from its hoop, inserted through a needle, and damaged after the needle was removed from the guidewire.Had the wire been damaged before use, the guidewire would not fit through the needle.A lot history review (lhr) of reap2219 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|