• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZIMMER GMBH ANATOMICAL SHOULDER REVERSE, SCREW SYSTEM, 4.5-48; ZIMMER TRABECULAR METAL REVERSE SHOULDER SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZIMMER GMBH ANATOMICAL SHOULDER REVERSE, SCREW SYSTEM, 4.5-48; ZIMMER TRABECULAR METAL REVERSE SHOULDER SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Failure to Align (2522)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 10/31/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturer did not receive x-rays, or other source documents for review.The manufacturer did not receive the device for investigation.The device history records were reviewed and found to be conforming.Additional information has been requested and is currently not available.A cause for this specific event cannot be ascertained from the information provided.As soon as supplemental information becomes available an updated report will be submitted.Zimmer biomet¿s reference number of this file is (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient was implanted a anatomical shoulder reverse, screw system, a 4.5-18 on an unknown side on (b)(6) 2016 and the patient underwent revision surgery on (b)(6) 2017 due to baseplate to glenoid interface failed.*note: this is a split case with zimmer inc., (b)(4) reference number (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation results were made available.Device history records (dhr): the device manufacturing quality records indicate that the released components met all requirements to perform as intended.Trend analysis: no trend considering the following event is identified: revision due to loosening.Review of event description: it was reported that a patient was revised 1 year post implantation due to failure of the baseplate to glenoid interface.The glenoid component became loose and needed revision.This complaint is a split case with zimmer inc., warsaw (b)(4).(mfr 0001822565-2017-08128) review of received data: no medical data such as x-rays, surgical notes or any other case-relevant documents were received.Devices analysis: no product was returned to zimmer biomet for in-depth analysis.According to the information received the device was discarded at the hospital as biohazard.Root cause analysis: root cause determination using dfmea: - insufficient primary stability of glenoid baseplate leading to loosening, pain, loss of function due to fixation of screws within bone is insufficient for intended use due to design => not possible: a systematic issue with design would have been detected as part of the issue evaluation assessment.- insufficient primary stability of glenoid baseplate leading to loosening, pain, loss of function due to surgeon uses too short screws into bone => possible: as with the information provided, it cannot be verified i f the choosen screws were in appropriate lenght.- disassociation, loss of function, pain due to locking strength of screw cap to baseplate, locking the screw position, is insufficient => possible: as with the information provided, it is unknown if the surgeon followed the surgical technique and/or if the surgeon is familiar with the suggested surgical technique.- insufficient primary stability of glenoid baseplate leading to loosening, pain, loss of function due to surgeon over-torques screws into bone => possible: as with the information provided, it is unknown if the surgeon followed the surgical technique and/or if the surgeon is familiar with the suggested surgical technique.Conclusion summary: neither x-rays or operative note were received; therefore the condition of the component is unknown.The device was was not received for investigation.Patient factors that may affect the performance of the components such as bone quality, activity level, type of activity (low impact vs.High impact), and relevant medical history are unknown.Adherence to rehabilitation protocol is unknown.The conducted root cause analysis did not come up with a specific root cause.A potential root cause might be that the surgeon did not follow the surgical procedure since a surgical report is not at hand and /or an other potential root cause might be wrong patient behaviour since adherence to rehabilitation protocol is unknown.However, an exact root cause could not be determined.The need for corrective measures is not indicated and zimmer gmbh considers this case as closed.Zimmer biomet's reference number of this file is (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient was implanted an anatomical shoulder reverse, screw system, and underwent a revision surgery after one year due to baseplate to glenoid interface failed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ANATOMICAL SHOULDER REVERSE, SCREW SYSTEM, 4.5-48
Type of Device
ZIMMER TRABECULAR METAL REVERSE SHOULDER SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZIMMER GMBH
sulzer allee 8
sulzer industrie park
winterthur 8404
SZ  8404
MDR Report Key7070135
MDR Text Key93292440
Report Number0009613350-2017-01694
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWT
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
PK052906
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/22/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/30/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date05/31/2021
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number01.04223.048
Device Lot Number2853359
Other Device ID Number00889024483064
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/18/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age66 YR
-
-