(b)(4).Internal file number - (b)(4): during processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a heavily calcified superficial femoral artery.Reportedly, the lesion was prepared with correct dilatation.The 5.0 x 150 mm supera self-expanding stent system (sess) advanced to the target lesion, but resistance was felt during deployment.When the sess was removed from the anatomy, it was noticed that the distal tip was missing.The tip remains embedded in the vessel, proximal to the stent.There was no clinically significant delay in procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The deployment issue was unable to be confirmed due to the condition of the returned device; however, the tip detachment was confirmed.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history revealed no other incidents reported from this lot.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported difficulties.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.Cine image was returned and reviewed by an abbott clinical specialist.The results of the review indicate that the reported tip detachment was possibly due to deployment of the stent against resistance.Although deployment stent against resistance may have contributed to the tip detachment, a cause for the resistance encountered could not be determined.A letter will not be requested.A review of the x-rays was received from james stokes today via e-mail and resides in documentum.The following conclusion statement was provided:, it was reported that a heavily calcified superficial femoral artery (sfa) lesion was properly prepared prior to stent deployment.The heavy calcium burden is evident on the images provided although further preparation might have been necessary to provide an optimal vessel diameter prior to stent deployment.During deployment, the operator reported that resistance was felt.Deployment continued and upon removal of the delivery system the catheter tip was missing, eventually being located within the sfa.Per the instructions for use (ifu) - section 9.5, stent deployment, #1 the following precaution is listed: precaution: should unusual resistance be felt at any time during stent system advancement or stent deployment the entire system should be removed together with the introducer sheath or guiding catheter as a single unit.Based upon the report this precaution may not have been followed and may have lead to the tip detachment.
|