(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr.: the device was returned with the stent fully mounted onto the delivery system.The device was returned still loaded onto the customer¿s guide wire.During product analysis, the investigator attempted to load the customer¿s guide wire and a boston scientific guidewire through this device, however severe resistance was encountered and the device could not be loaded onto the guide wire.A visual and microscopic examination noted two small perforations on the catheter of the device distal to the guide wire exit port; this type of damage is consistent with excessive force being applied to the device and the guide wire exiting out through the catheter.This was supported as the investigator observed the guide wire exiting out through the perforated catheter when they attempted to load the device onto the guide wire.During analysis, it was also noted that guide wire bypassed the guide wire exit port and continued down the inner shaft, this indicates that the inner shaft and outer sheath were not patent which may have prevented the guide wire from passing through the guide wire exit port.A visual and microscopic examination identified no damage or any issues with the stent or tip of the device that could have contributed to the complaint incident.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications. the investigation conclusion is handling damage as the complaint was caused by handling of the device or portion of the device without direct patient contact.(b)(4).
|
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 12-nov-2017.It was reported that difficulties tracking over the wire were encountered.The target lesion was located in the internal carotid artery.After a filter wire was advanced, an 8.0-29 carotid wallstent¿ was advanced to treat the lesion.However, the device was unable to advance over the filter wire and the filter wire did not exit the monorail port.The procedure was completed with another 8.0-29 carotid wallstent¿.No patient complications were reported.However, returned device analysis revealed perforations on the catheter of the device distal to the guide wire exit port.
|