(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.The reported stretched coils and the reported break/core were able to be confirmed.The reported device operates differently/prolapse was unable to be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.The reported difficult to remove was unable to be replicated in a testing environment due to the condition of the returned device.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.It should be noted the hi torque guide wires instructions for use states: do not allow the guide wire tip to remain in a prolapsed condition.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents from this lot.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat the 2nd and 3rd marginal branches of the left circumflex artery.A versaturn guide wire was placed in the left circumflex and the tip of the guide wire prolapsed.As the guide wire was being removed from the anatomy, it got stuck in the anatomy.After the guide wire was removed it was noted that the tip was stretched and the core had separated; however, the guide wire was still in one piece.There was no clinically significant delay in procedure and no adverse patient effects.No additional information was provided.
|