It was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed due to pain, limited motion, metallosis, elevated metal ions in blood.During the revision the bhr head and bhr cup were removed.As of today, device return and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.The available medical documents were reviewed.This (b)(6) patient a underwent a right bhr revision approximately 7.5 years post implantation due to report of pain, limited motion, elevated metal ions and mechanical complication.The revision op-report states that there was a cam impingement area of the femur and the acetabular component was in a retroverted and significantly over abducted orientation.The revision op-report also stated that intraoperatively there was no sign of purulence, no evidence seen of pseudotumor, soft tissue damage, or significant sign of metallosis.Neither supporting intra-op pathology findings nor lab results have been provided, which indicate the metal ion level.The reported clinical symptoms of pain, elevated metal ions may be consistent with an adverse reaction to metal debris, however this cannot be confirmed based on the information provided as it was reported that signs of metallosis were not seen grossly.The source of the elevated metal ions cannot be determined.The report of cam impingement cannot be excluded as a contributing factor to the reported complaint of limited motion.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirmthe details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|