A customer in (b)(6) had contacted biomérieux to report the misidentification of staphylococcus aureus as staphylococcus lugdunensis in association with the vitek® 2 gram-positive (gp) identification (id) test kit.An internal biomérieux investigation was performed; however, a viable strain was not received for the investigation.The customer reported setting up the strain (from several samples from the same patient) on cba incubated for 24 hours at 37c in ambient air.It was noted that purity, optics and densichek were indicated as being ok.There were no issues with samples from other patients.Twelve (12) lab reports were submitted.The following lab reports all showed very good identifications of s.Lugdenensis with two (2) atypical negative reactions (aglu, phos) for an identification of s.Aureus according to the vitek gp knowledge base: three (3) from (b)(6) 2017.Two (2) from (b)(6) 2017.One (1) from (b)(6) 2017.One (1) from (b)(6) 2017.One (1) lab report from (b)(6) 2017 showed a good identification of s.Aureus, and two (2) lab reports showed a low discrimination identification between s.Aureus and s.Lugdunensis, which is considered to be a correct call.One (1) lab report from (b)(6) 2017 showed a very good identification of staphylococcus pseudintermedius with three (3) atypical reactions (phos-, ure+, dman-) for an identification of s.Aureus according to the vitek gp knowledge base.Atypical reactions can indicate contamination, mixed culture, compromised viability of the strain, use of non-recommended media, other user set up errors, or an atypical strain.However, without the strain or raw data, it was not possible to further evaluate the cause of the misidentification.The vitek 2 gp id test kit lot 2420460203 met final qc release criteria and passed qc performance testing.
|