It was reported that the procedure was to treat a narrow and concentric right coronary artery.During preparation, the protective sheath could not be removed from a 4.0 x 33 mm xience prime stent delivery system.Then, the stent became damaged after the protective sheath was pulled forcibly.Additionally, the tip was separated from the device.Therefore, another 4.0 x 33 mm xience prime stent delivery system was used to successfully complete the procedure.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure and no adverse patient effects.No additional information was provided.
|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: a visual and dimensional inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported tip detachment was confirmed and the reported material deformation (stent damage) was not confirmed.The reported difficulty to remove could not be replicated in a testing environment as the sheath and stylet were already removed.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.It should be noted that the xience prime everolimus eluting coronary stent system instruction for use states: remove the product mandrel and protective stent sheath by grasping the catheter just proximal to the stent (at the proximal balloon bond site), and with the other hand, grasp the stent protector and gently remove distally.If unusual resistance is felt during product mandrel and stent sheath removal, do not use this product and replace with another.Additionally, the investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported material deformation (stent damage) as no material deformation was noted during returned device analysis.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|