• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. EPIDURAL CATHETERIZATION SET: 19 GA; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. EPIDURAL CATHETERIZATION SET: 19 GA; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number EC-05400-E
Device Problem Leak/Splash (1354)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/30/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device has not been returned for investigation at this time.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend related events.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the drug leaked and could not be used properly.So the physician did not use it and he finished the procedure with teleflex's same product.The filters and the catheter were replaced.There was no patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).A device history record review was performed on the epidural catheter with no relevant findings.The customer reported medication was leaking from the catheter.The customer returned one opened kit (reference files (b)(4)).The epidural catheter was removed from the returned kit and visually examined with and without magnification.Visual examination of the returned catheter revealed that the catheter appears typical but used.Adhesive material can be seen on the outer extrusion of the catheter.No other defects or anomalies were observed.A functional leak test was performed per mrq 000017 section 7.5 rev.7 using the returned catheter and a lab inventory snaplock adapter with the lab leak tester (c05176).The proximal end of the catheter was inserted into the snaplock adapter until it bottomed out and the components were locked.The catheter was confirmed to be secured by tugging gently.The snaplock adapter was then connected to the lab leak tester and the pressure was increased to 10 psi to establish flow.The distal end of the catheter was then capped off and the pressure was increased to 25 psi for 30 seconds.No leak was detected coming from the catheter.Other remarks: the reported complaint of the catheter leaking could not be confirmed based on the sample received.A device history record review was performed on the epidural catheter with no evidence to suggest a manufacturing related cause.The returned catheter passed a functional leak test.There were no functional issues found with the returned catheter.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the drug leaked and could not be used properly.So the physician did not use it and he finished the procedure with teleflex's same product.The filters and the catheter were replaced.There was no patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EPIDURAL CATHETERIZATION SET: 19 GA
Type of Device
CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
reading PA
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL CR, A.S.
jamska 2359/47
zdar nad sazavou 591 0 1
EZ   591 01
Manufacturer Contact
jasmine brown
3015 carrington mill blvd
morrisville, NC 27560
9193614124
MDR Report Key7128462
MDR Text Key95252291
Report Number3006425876-2017-00589
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CAZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
PMA/PMN Number
K103658
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2018
Device Catalogue NumberEC-05400-E
Device Lot Number71F16G1294
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/26/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received12/19/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/22/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/22/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/27/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-