As the device was not available for return, no device analysis was possible.Furthermore, there was no reported issue with the device according to the follow-up information received.The available information suggests that the initially implanted device was the incorrect size, since the replacement device was not the same size as the initially implanted device.As such, the event is likely attributable to mis-sizing, and is deemed to be not device-related.No further investigation is warranted at this time; however, if further information becomes available in the future, appropriate investigative actions will be taken.
|
The manufacturer was notified of the following event via patient tracking: on (b)(6) 2015 two devices were implanted at the same location (dla23, sn (b)(4) and dla21, sn (b)(4)).There was no indication on the patient registration form of which device remained implanted.Additional information received upon follow-up indicated that the patient outcome was good, and there was no reported issue with the device.No further information was available.
|