It was reported the patient presented with severe coronary artery disease in 5 vessels and coded at the hospital.The patient was not a surgical candidate; therefore, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed.The vessels were heavily calcified with moderate tortuosity.First, the left anterior descending artery was treated successfully without patient consequences.The patient was put on a ventricular assist device to continue treating the other vessels and the patient continued to be stable.The balance middleweight (bmw) guide wire was advanced down the distal circumflex to the obtuse marginal artery, but angiography revealed that approximately 30 mm of the guide wire tip had prolapsed.The guide wire tip was looped where the vessel was 99% stenosed, so when the physician attempted to re-position the guide wire, the guide wire tip separated.A snare device was used to remove the separate tip successfully.The vessel was re-wired with a non-abbott guide wire successfully; however, a perforation occurred.The perforation was sealed with ballooning and stent placement successfully.Echocardiogram noted no tamponade and no leaks.The patient continued to be in stable condition when he was removed from the cath lab; however, the patient died the next morning.The reported cause of death was due to severe multi-vessel coronary artery disease and very poor health.Reportedly, the bmw did not cause or contribute to the perforation as the guide wire had been removed before the perforation occurred and occurred 25 mm distal to where the bmw guide wire had been placed.No additional information was provided.
|
(b)(4).The device was initially reported as returning; however, the device was not returned.The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents from this lot.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure as it is likely that as the guide wire was advanced interaction with the heavily calcified, moderately torturous and 99% stenosed anatomy resulted in the guide wire to become prolapsed resulting in the reported device operates differently.Manipulation to re-position the guide wire and/or interaction with the 99% stenosed anatomy resulted in the reported tip detachment.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|