• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 46MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 46MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 74121146
Device Problems Metal Shedding Debris (1804); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Inflammation (1932); Necrosis (1971); Pain (1994); Swelling (2091); Joint Dislocation (2374); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 03/31/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that patient underwent left hip revision surgery due to pain, inflammation/swelling, infection, dislocation, hypertrophy and necrosis, elevated chromium and cobalt levels and metallosis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed due to pain, inflammation/swelling, infection, dislocation, hypertrophy and necrosis, elevated chromium and cobalt levels and metallosis.During the revision the bhr head was removed, the bhr cup remains implanted.As of today, device return and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.The available medical documents were reviewed.This us legal case was re-opened due to the receipt of medical documents.It was reported eight years post-implantation of a left hip revision surgery due to pain, inflammation/swelling, infection, dislocation, hypertrophy and necrosis,elevated chromium and cobalt levels and metallosis.The explant, was not provided for inclusion in this investigation.According to the revision operative report, "it was evident that there was a significant reaction to the metal with discoloration, hypertrophy and necrosis of the synovial lining.Copious amounts of fluids was seen and the muscle damage was minimal.Once a clear view of the acetabulum was possible.The component was not visually damaged or scratched and was appropriately verted and oriented and solidly fixed."the corresponding laboratory findings for the cobalt and chromium levels were not provided.The reported intraoperative findings of discoloration, hypertrophy and necrosis of the synovial lining are consistent with an adverse reaction to metal debris.However, without the images, the explanted device and metal ion levels, the root cause cannot be concluded.The impact to the patient beyond the revision cannot be concluded.It was also noted that use of a competitor's (stryker) dual mobility liner, femoral head and stem devices were implanted with the bhr cup at the time of revision.This activity was performe contrary to the instructions for use of for bhr implants which states under its important medical information, "do not mix components from other manufacturers".Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
 
Event Description
Bilateral patient.It was reported that, after a left bhr on (b)(6) 2008 plaintiff has experienced pain and metallosis.Plaintiff underwent a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2016.Plaintiff outcome is unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported that, after a thr on (b)(6) 2008, a revision surgery was performed on (b)(6)2016 to revise the left hip due to pain, inflammation/swelling, infection, dislocation, hypertrophy and necrosis, elevated chromium, and cobalt levels and metallosis.The current health status of patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 46MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house
spa park
leamington spa CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house
spa park
leamington spa CV31 3HL
UK   CV31 3HL
Manufacturer Contact
markus poettker
schachenallee 29
aarau 05001
SZ   05001
MDR Report Key7137534
MDR Text Key95465267
Report Number3005975929-2017-00469
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NXT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040033
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Attorney
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/25/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/21/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2012
Device Catalogue Number74121146
Device Lot Number080076
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/12/2007
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
74120152/ACETLR CUP HAP 52MM W/ IMPTR/086059; FEMORAL HEAD, PART AND LOT # UNKNOWN; FEMORAL HEAD, PART AND LOT # UNKNOWN
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age59 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-