• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG LUMAX 640 DR-T; ICD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG LUMAX 640 DR-T; ICD Back to Search Results
Model Number 372180
Device Problems Under-Sensing (1661); Battery Problem (2885)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/05/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Ous mdr - this icd was explanted and replaced due to lack of detection of a ventricular arrhythmia episode and a warning message of excessive current consumption.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receipt, the device interrogation revealed the battery status mol2, 29 charging cycles were documented to the device memory.The memory content of the device was inspected.During the analysis of the available iegms noise was observed in the atrial and ventricular channel as well as in the far field channel, leading to multiple charging cycles, confirming the clinical observation.Therefore a sensing test was performed and showed noise during the sensing of attached heart signals in the atrial and ventricular channel.In a next step the icd was opened and the inner assembly was inspected.The visual inspection of the inner assembly showed no anomalies.Further electrical investigations revealed that an electrostatic discharge protection transistor as a part of the integrated circuit of the electronic module was damaged, causing an elevated current consumption as well as the failure to sense.This type of damage is a typical sign for high voltages which have been applied externally to the device.As it was reported that the patient was defibrillated externally, this is most likely the root cause for the clinical observation.The manufacturing process for this device was re-investigated.All production steps had been performed accordingly.There was no sign of any inconsistency during the manufacturing process which might be related to the clinical observation.Particularly the final acceptance test proved the device functions to be as specified.In conclusion, a damaged integrated circuit on the electronic module was identified that led to an elevated current consumption as well as the failure to sense heart signals free of noise, confirming the clinical observation.The manufacturing records document a normal device production.Based on the available information it is assumed that the damage occurred as a consequence of the reported external defibrillation.For any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUMAX 640 DR-T
Type of Device
ICD
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin D-123 59
GM  D-12359
Manufacturer Contact
6024 jean road
lake oswego, OR 97035
8772459800
MDR Report Key7138321
MDR Text Key95530297
Report Number1028232-2017-04642
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P050023
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/14/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number372180
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/14/2017
Initial Date FDA Received12/21/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/15/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/27/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/13/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-