Model Number 04.601.000 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional narrative: (b)(6).Patient weight not available for reporting.Date of device breakage is not known.(b)(4), lot unknown.Date of implant is not known.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported patient was implanted with the veptr rib expansion construct on unknown date.Patient was returned to surgery on (b)(6) 2017 due to a broken 90 degree titanium s-hook/right.The s-hook was replaced, surgery was completed successfully.(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The subject device has been received by the manufacturer and is undergoing investigation.The results of the investigation are pending completion and will be submitted in a supplemental report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Part 04.601.000, lot h170137: release to warehouse date: september 02, 2016.Manufacturing site: (b)(4).No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record (dhr) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any sub-components, that would contribute to this complaint condition.A product investigation was completed: the returned s-hook was confirmed to be broken.The broken fragments were returned.The s-hook was also found to be bent and has nicks and gouges across the balance of the device.Replication of the complaint condition is not applicable as the device is already broken.The diameter of the broken fragment of the hook measured and were within the specification.Based on review of the dhr records there is no indication that any material issues contributed to the complaint condition.There were no issues during the manufacture of this product that would contribute to this complaint condition.During the investigation, no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was noted the patient was stable following surgery.Initially it was reported the pelvic hook fractured into pieces that were difficult to remove.During the investigation it was noted it was also found to be bent and has nicks and gouges across the balance of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|