The product was disposed of by the hospital and is no longer available for return.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The product lot number was not provided, therefore, the manufacturing records could not be reviewed.The hospital disposed of the device.
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in a branch of the mesenteric artery using ruby coils.During the procedure, while deploying a ruby coil into the aneurysm using a non-penumbra microcatheter, the physician determined that the coil was the incorrect size.Therefore, the physician removed and re-sheathed the coil.Later in the procedure, while attempting to re-deploy the ruby coil that was previously re-sheathed, the physician was unable to advance the coil back out of its introducer sheath and into the microcatheter.The ruby coil was stuck inside its sheath and therefore, the introducer sheath containing the ruby coil was removed.It was reported that the physician did not rinse the ruby coil in a saline bath prior to attempting to re-deploy it.The procedure was completed using a new ruby coil and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|