• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA COIL 400; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA COIL 400; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 4006C0406
Device Problems Retraction Problem (1536); Failure to Advance (2524); Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/22/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The embolization coil was intact with its pusher assembly and had offset winds.The introducer sheath had coagulated blood inside.The embolization coil was advanced out of its introducer sheath.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that the penumbra coil 400 (pc400) embolization had offset coil winds.This type of damage typically occurs due to improper handling during use.If the device forcefully advanced against resistance, damage such as this may occur.Further evaluation of the returned device revealed that the introducer sheath had coagulated blood inside and part of the embolization coil was advanced out of its introducer sheath.If continuous flush is not used, blood is more likely to coagulate on the embolization coil and inside the introducer sheath, which may contribute to difficulty when re-sheathing.The root cause of the initial reported resistance could not be determined.The px slim delivery microcatheter (px slim) mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the right inferior gluteal artery using penumbra coil 400s (pc400s).During the procedure, the physician successfully placed a pc400 using a px slim delivery microcatheter (px slim).The physician then felt resistance and was unable to advance a second pc400 more than halfway through the px slim.The physician therefore removed and attempted to re-sheathe the pc400, however was unable to retract it into the introducer sheath.The procedure was then completed using the same px slim, additional pc400s, and additional coils.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA COIL 400
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key7151162
MDR Text Key96025248
Report Number3005168196-2017-02291
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548011899
UDI-Public00814548011899
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/28/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/28/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date03/31/2021
Device Catalogue Number4006C0406
Device Lot NumberF33956
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/14/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/28/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/18/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age83 YR
-
-