• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL DETACHMENT HANDLE; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL DETACHMENT HANDLE; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SCH1
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 12/01/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2017-02312, 3005168196-2017-02314.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the right gastro-epiploic artery using penumbra smart coils (smart coils) and a penumbra smart coil detachment handle (handle).During the procedure, the physician placed three initial non-penumbra coils into the proximal side of the parent vessel using a non-penumbra microcatheter.While attempting to advance a new smart coil out of its introducer sheath and into the microcatheter, the physician experienced resistance and the smart coil would not advance out.Therefore, the smart coil was removed and a new smart coil was opened.Next, the physician advanced the new smart coil into the target vessel and attempted to detach it using the handle but was unsuccessful.After two failed attempts, the physician opened a new handle and the smart coil was successfully detached.The procedure was then completed using five new smart coils, seven additional coils, the same microcatheter and the second handle.There was no report of adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: there was no visible damage to the penumbra smart coil detachment handle (handle).Conclusions: evaluation of the returned smart coil revealed that it was unable to be advanced out of its introducer sheath due to offset coil winds.If the introducer sheath is not properly aligned inside the hub, offset coil winds may result.If the embolization coil becomes damaged, resistance will likely be experienced when advancing into the parent catheter.Evaluation of the returned penumbra smart coil detachment handle (handle) revealed that it was able to exhibit sufficient pull force and throw distance.The root cause of the difficulty detaching could not be determined.Penumbra coils and handles are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SMART COIL DETACHMENT HANDLE
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key7154752
MDR Text Key96112984
Report Number3005168196-2017-02313
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548016139
UDI-Public00814548016139
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K160832
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/01/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/29/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date07/04/2022
Device Catalogue NumberSCH1
Device Lot NumberF78027
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/27/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/04/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/05/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age83 YR
-
-