• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A. CERTAS INLINE VLV W/UNTZD CAT; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A. CERTAS INLINE VLV W/UNTZD CAT; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 82-8802
Device Problem Kinked (1339)
Patient Problem Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).It is not clear at this point if the device and/or lot information is available.Without the device and/or lot information it is not possible for codman to conduct a proper investigation.If the device is returned the complaint will be investigated and a follow up report will be filed.If lot information does becomes available and if the record review indicates that there was a non-conformity a follow up report will be filed.Trends will be monitored for this and similar complaints.At the present time this complaint is closed.Device not available.
 
Event Description
The valve was implanted to the patient via lp-shunt for inph.Just after the surgery, although gait disorder was improved, the kink of the catheter was confirmed when examined due to gait disorder deterioration.On (b)(6) 2017: the surgery was performed for replacement of the catheter.Even it was improved one, the patient complained a stomach ache on (b)(6), and he came to the site.The infection was suspected and the surgery was performed on (b)(6).The cell number was about 300-400.He was follow-up without shunting but he wanted the shunting because walking will be improved.On (b)(6) 2017: the revision surgery was performed via vp shuntwith the valve (82-8802).On (b)(6) 2017: he was discharged with good progress in walking improvement consideration1: the number of cells already had 300-400 when revising the catheter on (b)(6), so it might have been infected at this time.It may be that csf stagnated due to kink and the number of cells increased consideration2: because the size of the valve was larger than chpv, it may be considered as one factor that the shape was more infectious than chpv.(this site uses micro a valve 82-3112 for lp shunt, especially the difference in size compared with certas was obvious) (b)(6).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Three potential lot numbers were provided: cvccnj, 122310, 130588.While we were not able to identify the specific lot involved in this event, review of the provided three numbers found there were no discrepancies in any of these lots prior to distribution of the devices.If additional relevant information becomes available, a follow-up report will be submitted.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CERTAS INLINE VLV W/UNTZD CAT
Type of Device
SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS
Manufacturer (Section D)
CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A.
rue girardet 29
le locle CH 24 00
SZ  CH 2400
Manufacturer Contact
james kenney
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5088282726
MDR Report Key7169360
MDR Text Key96585448
Report Number1226348-2018-10029
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112156
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Medical Equipment Company Technician/Representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/05/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number82-8802
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/15/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-