• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT HI-TORQUE BALANCE MIDDLEWEIGHT UNIVERSAL II GUIDE WIRE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT HI-TORQUE BALANCE MIDDLEWEIGHT UNIVERSAL II GUIDE WIRE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1009664
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Difficult To Position (1467); Difficult to Remove (1528); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 12/15/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a heavily tortuous unspecified coronary artery, and the right radial artery was accessed.There was difficulty advancing an unspecified guiding catheter; therefore, a 190 cm balance middleweight universal ii guide wire was advanced.However, the guide wire met resistance with the guiding catheter.This caused the guide wire tip to become prolapsed and form a knot when it passed through the guiding catheter.Therefore, another larger unspecified guiding catheter was used to go over the knotted tip of the guide wire.The tip of the guide wire was then being pulled out while the guiding catheter remained in place.However, the knotted tip of the guide wire separated in the radial artery after excessive force was applied; therefore, the physician applied manual pressure to keep the guide wire in place.The guiding catheter was then slowly advanced again while the remaining guide wire tip was being pulled back.It was then noted that the guide wire tip was attached to the guiding catheter.Therefore, the guide wire tip was simply withdrawn with the guiding catheter.The radial access was aborted and a femoral approach was done to successfully complete the procedure.There was a 10 minute delay in the procedure, but it was not clinically significant and there were no adverse patient effects.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.The reported detachment, kinked, stretched and device operates differently than expected/prolapse were able to be confirmed.The reported difficult to position and difficult to remove were unable to be replicated in a testing environment due to the condition of the returned device.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.It should be noted the hi-torque guide wires for ptca, pta, and stents instructions for use states: if resistance is observed at any time, determine the cause under fluoroscopy and take remedial action as needed.Do not push, auger, withdraw, or torque a guide wire that meets resistance.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure as it is likely that due to the heavily tortuous anatomy and/or interaction with the guiding catheter the guide wire met resistance with the guiding catheter resulting in the guide wire tip to become prolapsed and form a knot when it passed through the guiding catheter; thus resulting in the reported difficulty to position.Attempts to pull out the tip of the guide wire resulted in the reported/noted device damages (kinked/bent tip, stretched coils) and ultimately resulted in the reported/noted coil/ribbon/tip detachment; thus resulting in the reported difficulty to remove.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
 
Event Description
Subsequent to the initial report, additional information was received.The account provided device photos showing that the coils of the guide wire were stretched and several kinks were found at the tip.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HI-TORQUE BALANCE MIDDLEWEIGHT UNIVERSAL II GUIDE WIRE
Type of Device
GUIDE WIRE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARCELONETA, PUERTO RICO REG# 3005737652
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key7172683
MDR Text Key96665950
Report Number2024168-2018-00158
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K072460
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/26/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/08/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2019
Device Catalogue Number1009664
Device Lot Number7110272
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/11/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/24/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/01/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age57 YR
Patient Weight136
-
-