• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OSTEOMED MEDIUM 6 HOLE BSSO PLATE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OSTEOMED MEDIUM 6 HOLE BSSO PLATE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 214-0100
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/15/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The root cause for the broken mini, 6 hole, medium bsso plate, p/n 214-0100, is undetermined.The bsso plate broke and was explanted only 10 days after implantation.The plate is expected to be used for 3 months until osteogenesis occurs in the mandible beneath the plate.The examination of the plate shows that the plate was bent both up and down, as well as left to right directions.The bending was done in an effort to conform the plate to the geometry of the mandible section it was being attached to.Per the ifu, multiple bending may weaken the plate and could result in implant fracture and failure.The ifu also states that screw selection is important to consider, based upon bone quality, bone type functional loads exerted on the bone(s), and post-operative patient compliance.Since the bsso plate broke within 10 days of the surgery, osteogenesis would not have occurred.The post-operative instructions given to the patient are unknown.The bone quality of the patient is unknown.However, for the plate to break, a force was applied sometime after surgery, and before the follow-up procedure.Though the exact root cause of the break is unknown, possible causes could be due to a weakened plate, incorrect screw selection, along with post-surgery patient activity.The review of the dhr did not identify any non-conformances with lot release.The review of capas and ncrs did not identify any internal non-conformances for this device.The review of the complaint history shows that this is the first complaint ever received for this device.Per the m3/m4 risk management file, this issues has an overall risk level scroe of low.This issue will be monitored through routine trending.Qa note: during an audit of mdr submissions, we identified that there was an error on the initial submission and follow-up reports that prevented upload to maude.Therefore, this report is being re-submitted.Date of original submission report: 01/25/2017.Date of follow-up report submission: 03/23/2017.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2017, osteomed received notification of an incident concerning the medium 6 hole bsso plate (p/n 214-0100).A few days after the orthognathic surgery, the bsso plate was broken.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MEDIUM 6 HOLE BSSO PLATE
Type of Device
MEDIUM 6 HOLE BSSO PLATE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OSTEOMED
3885 arapaho road
addison TX 75001
Manufacturer (Section G)
OSTEOMED
3885 arapaho road
addison TX 75001
Manufacturer Contact
latoia phillips
3885 arapaho road
addison, TX 75001
MDR Report Key7186393
MDR Text Key97133068
Report Number2027754-2017-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DZL
UDI-Device Identifier0845694003728
UDI-Public(01)0845694003728(10)1078298(30)1(11)140910
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBR
PMA/PMN Number
K911936
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Dentist
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/12/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Catalogue Number214-0100
Device Lot Number1078298
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/24/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/12/2017
Initial Date FDA Received01/12/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/10/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age47 YR
-
-