• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 50MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 50MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 74121150
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Pain (1994); Synovitis (2094); Toxicity (2333); Injury (2348); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 05/02/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that patient underwent right hip revision surgery due to pain, failed right hip resurfacing, femoral neck fracture, synovitis, fluid around hip and metallosis.Noted as two-step revision on (b)(6) 2013 and (b)(6) 2014.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed due to pain, failed right hip resurfacing, femoral neck fracture, synovitis, fluid around hip and metallosis.The bhr head removed during surgery, bhr cup remained implanted.As of today, device return and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.The available medical documents were reviewed.The provided implantation report did not reveal any inconsistencies related to the surgical technique that could explain the later revision.According to the provided revision report, the patient had a femoral stress fracture at the neck and the cup remained in-vivo with good position.No possible reasons for the stress fracture were described.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision, the bhr head was removed.The bhr cup remained implanted.As of today, device return and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.The available medical documents were reviewed.Patient was discharged back to work seven weeks post implantation.Patient was seen in the office with complaint of groin pain four months post implantation and was wondering if he was over-doing it.An april 2013 bone scan showed developing fracture along the medial aspect of the right femoral neck.It cannot be determined to what extent the patient¿s early return to work and the physical demands of his job had on his clinical status.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.Further, it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 50MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house
spa park
leamington spa CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
MDR Report Key7188832
MDR Text Key97288440
Report Number3005975929-2018-00015
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NXT
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P040033
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/14/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/15/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2016
Device Catalogue Number74121150
Device Lot Number11MW35407
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/10/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
74120156/ACETLR CUP HAP 56MM W/ IMPTR/11KW34498; ACETABULAR CUP, PART AND LOT # UNKNOWN
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age51 YR
-
-