• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY2C1260
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Physical Resistance (2578); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 12/29/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the ruby coil was stuck inside the lantern.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned devices revealed that the lantern was ovalized and the ruby coil was stuck inside.The ovalization in the lantern typically occurs due to improper handling during use.If the device is forcefully gripped or pinched during insertion, damage such as this may occur.Further evaluation of the returned devices revealed that the ruby coil was stuck inside the lantern and detached from its pusher assembly.If the device is advanced through a damaged catheter, resistance may be experienced and the device may get stuck.Subsequently, if the device is forcefully retracted against resistance, the embolization coil may detach from its pusher assembly.The ruby coil being advance through a damage catheter likely contributed the resistance experience and subsequently, retraction against resistance resulted in the unintentional detachment.A stainless steel mandrel was advanced through the lantern.While advancing the stainless steel mandrel through the lantern, resistance was encountered as the mandrel approached the proximal end of the embolization coil that was stuck inside the lantern and the mandrel could not be advanced any further.The ruby coil was detached and stuck inside the lantern and, therefore, could not be functionally tested.The ruby coil's pusher assembly was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra catheters and coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2018-00211.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the right femoral artery using lantern delivery microcatheters (lanterns) and ruby coils.During the procedure, while attempting to advance a ruby coil through a lantern, the physician mentioned resistance.The ruby coil then became stuck and subsequently, unintentionally detached inside the lantern.Therefore, the lantern containing the detached coil was removed.The procedure was completed using a new lantern and a ruby coil.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer (Section G)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key7219062
MDR Text Key98423707
Report Number3005168196-2018-00212
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548013022
UDI-Public00814548013022
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/29/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Catalogue NumberRBY2C1260
Device Lot NumberF78202
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/17/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/29/2017
Initial Date FDA Received01/25/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/17/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age80 YR
-
-