• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. HS FOCUS 9CM PLUS ADAPTIVE; INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. HS FOCUS 9CM PLUS ADAPTIVE; INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number HAR9F
Device Problems Overheating of Device (1437); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problems Scar Tissue (2060); Burn, Thermal (2530); Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn (2696); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 01/07/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Batch # p9363w.Investigation summary: the device was returned with no apparent damage.  the device was connected to a test handpiece and generator and it did activate.During functional testing, the device was activated for about 1 minute with no abnormal heat observed.  the instrument was disassembled and it was found to have thermal damage at the shrouds.Heat was generated at this area resulting in the melting of the shrouds.  this damage could have resulted from not torquing the instrument properly to the hand piece; resulting in excessive heat generation at the shrouds the batch history record was reviewed and no defects, nc¿s or protocols related to the complaint, were found during the manufacturing process.Additional information: what is the surgeon experience with this device? she uses on a weekly basis.She is very comfortable with the device and knows to takes steps to cool down the device.She expressed that it was the first time she felt the device arm get heated.The tech noticed that when the surgeon handed the device off during the procedure, they could feel the heat of the device through their gloves.How long had the device been used? during procedure.What heat management technique were utilized during surgical procedure? wet gauze.Where is the burn in relation to the incision? on the neck.When was the burn noticed? during procedure.Will the patient need any follow-up? pt has been seen as a follow up- will need cosmetic procedure around the area it was burnt.What is the current patient condition? scar looks sub optimal.Pt is ok, scar will need a cosmetic revision.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a thyroidectomy the blade of the device got very hot and when the surgeon laid the device on the patient's neck the patient was burned.The device was noted to be hotter than normal tip to tip.Heat came from the entire device.The active blade piece was hottest.The burn came from the metal piece laying on the patient¿s neck.The severity of the burn was third degree.The tissue of the burn had to be excised.The procedure was completed with an alternate like device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HS FOCUS 9CM PLUS ADAPTIVE
Type of Device
INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
Manufacturer Contact
milton garrett
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
5133378865
MDR Report Key7232681
MDR Text Key98734816
Report Number3005075853-2018-07679
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LFL
UDI-Device Identifier20705036014666
UDI-Public20705036014666
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K132612
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/12/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/31/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Expiration Date08/31/2022
Device Catalogue NumberHAR9F
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/23/2018
Date Manufacturer Received01/12/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/04/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number0
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-