• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET UK LTD. UNKNOWN OXFORD FEMORAL COMPONENT; KNEE PROSTHESIS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET UK LTD. UNKNOWN OXFORD FEMORAL COMPONENT; KNEE PROSTHESIS Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Bone Fracture(s) (1870)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).A journal article entitled "long-term outcomes of over 8,000 medial oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knees¿a systematic review", by mohammad hr, (2017), investigated under (b)(4), was based on a review of 15 other publications.Separate complaints have been raised to investigate journals mentioned in this medical paper.This complaint refers to the study entitled "causes and time of surgical interventions after oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: results of a 15 years vreden institute experience" by kornilov, nn, (2016), presented at oxford partial knee 40 year symposium 2016.This journal article could not be located however, the summary of the reported adverse events has been found in the supplemental material within the following journal article: hasan r mohammad, louise strickland, thomas w hamilton & david w murray."long-term outcomes of over 8,000 medial oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knees¿a systematic review" (2017).Issn: 1745-3674 (print) 1745-3682 (online) journal homepage: http://www.Tandfonline.Com/loi/iort20 report source, foreign ¿ events occurred in (b)(6).As limited information was received from the complainant, the reported events could not be confirmed.As the lot number of the devices are unknown, dhr reviews could not be performed.Root causes could not be determined.If further information is found that would change or alter any conclusions reached, a supplemental approach will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
 
Event Description
A journal article entitled "long-term outcomes of over 8,000 medial oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knees¿a systematic review", by mohammad hr, (2017), investigated under (b)(4), was based on a review of 15 other publications.Separate complaints have been raised to investigate journals mentioned in this medical paper.This complaint refers to the study entitled "causes and time of surgical interventions after oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: results of a 15 years vreden institute experience" by kornilov, nn, (2016), presented at oxford partial knee 40 year symposium 2016.This journal article could not be located however, the summary of the reported adverse events has been found in the supplemental material within mr mohammad's article.This complaint refers to 3 knee revisions due to fracture of medial tibial/femoral condyle.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN OXFORD FEMORAL COMPONENT
Type of Device
KNEE PROSTHESIS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET UK LTD.
waterton industrial estates
bridgend CF31 3XA
UK  CF31 3XA
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET UK LTD.
waterton industrial estates
bridgend CF31 3XA
UK   CF31 3XA
Manufacturer Contact
christina arnt
56 e. bell dr.
warsaw, IN 46582
5745273773
MDR Report Key7258616
MDR Text Key99610280
Report Number3002806535-2018-00267
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeRS
PMA/PMN Number
PN/A
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/09/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/09/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/23/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-