|
Catalog Number 50-23410 |
Device Problems
Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Fracture (1260)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 01/30/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device has been received at the manufacturer for testing.An evaluation will be conducted, and a follow-up report will be submitted after the quality investigation is complete.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by the company representative that during an orthognathic/double jaw case, a screw fractured off at the head.The product was recovered from the patient, and no adverse consequences nor medical intervention was reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported event could be confirmed.In the related (b)(4) it was stated: ¿(¿) one bone screw, cross-pin, diam.2.0x10mm broken during surgery, was returned in order to determine the root cause of the failure.The returned screw was examined regarding its dimensions, chemical composition (edx analysis) as well as by light and scanning electron microscopy.The measurable dimensions are in accordance with the specification.The chemical composition conforms to the specification - tial6v4 (ti grade 5).The investigation shows that the screw broke because of too high torsional and tensile forces (whereas the torsional forces prevailed) during the insertion.The friction traces on the bottom side of the head show that this screws already contacted the plate and were further tightened.The broken tip of the screw (thread fragment) was strongly damaged and the fracture surface completely destroyed by medical instruments during the removal from the patient.The intact fracture surfaces show the typical flow structure of a ductile torsional breakage and additionally the honeycomb structure of a ductile forced rupture caused by high tractive forces.The root cause of the failure was the fact that after the screw contacted the plate it was forcibly further turned.Indications for material or manufacturing related problems were not found in this investigation.(¿)¿ further information was requested several times in order to gain more insight in the reported event.The sales representative has provided the catalog number of the used blade and drill.The blade is designed and is intended to be used for 2.0 mm, 2.3 mm screws, therefore this blade is appropriate to be used with the affected screw.The drill is intended to be used for screw lengths between 10 to 20 mm as illustrated in the leibinger brochure (fig.1).Thus, the drill bit is suitable for use with the affected screw.The drill bit suggested by the company representative is intended only for screws with lengths of up to 7 mm.Regardless, during investigation, it was found out that the root cause was due to the screw being overtightened.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by the company representative that during an orthognathic/double jaw case, a screw fractured off at the head.The product was recovered from the patient, and no adverse consequences nor medical intervention was reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|