Results: the penumbra smart coil's (smart coil) embolization coil was intact with the pusher and had offset coil winds near the proximal end.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed the embolization coil had offset coil winds near the proximal end.This type of damage typically occurs if the introducer sheath is not properly aligned in the hub of the microcatheter prior to advancement.The offset coil winds caused resistance while advancing during functional testing.The non-penumbra microcatheter mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the anterior communicating artery (a-com) using penumbra smart coils (smart coils).During the procedure, the physician placed six smart coils and three non-penumbra coils in the target vessel using a non-penumbra microcatheter.While attempting to advance a new smart coil out of its introducer sheath and into the microcatheter, the physician experienced resistance and the coil became stuck at the hub of the microcatheter; therefore, it was removed.The procedure was completed using two other smart coils and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|