On (b)(6) 2018, the surgery for degenerative disease was performed by using the mountaineer system.The fixed area was c4 ¿ c6.When the device in question was used, it had been bent.So, the bending part was fixed.When the same device was used again, the tip of the device in question was broken.The broken part was about 2 cm from the tip.The surgery was completed with no delay, and there was no adverse consequence to the patient.
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Visual examination at the macroscopic level revealed that the fracture was located toward the probe¿s distal tip.The second part of the tip was not provided for evaluation.Device was then sent for fracture analysis.The fracture analysis report shows evidence of plastic deformation and a rough appearance across the entire surface, indicating that the probe underwent a static overload failure.No material defects or other abnormalities were observed in this analysis.A review of the device history record (dhr) for the ball point pedicle feeler could not be performed.Multiple attempts to attain dhr review was conducted.However, lot number could not be found.Therefore, without the lot number, no review of the manufacturing records could be completed.All complaint trends will be evaluated as a part of the depuy spine monthly complaint review meeting.A definitive root cause for the pedicle feeler¿s distal tip fracturing cannot be positively determined.However, the fracture analysis report shows evidence of plastic deformation and a rough appearance across the entire surface, indicating that the probe underwent a static overload failure.As there has been no issue identified in the manufacturing or release of the device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer and no systemic trends were found, this complaint file will be closed with no further action required.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|