• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH; ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH; ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH Back to Search Results
Model Number M00545000
Device Problem Bent (1059)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/24/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Although the suspect device has been received, the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a rx cytology brush was used in an unknown procedure performed on (b)(6) 2018.According to the complainant, during preparation, the brush failed to retract, and the bristled portion of the brush was noted to be bent.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A visual evaluation of the returned rx cytology brush revealed that the device was received in extended position.The working length (extrusion and pull wire) was free from obvious kinks and bends.No visual issues were noted on the device.Functional analysis was performed and showed that the brush extends properly however; it was unable to retract completely.Further evaluation noted that the brush tip remained outside the catheter when handle was in closed/retracted position.The device was inspected and its measurements were found to be within manufacturing specification.Based on all gathered information, the most probable cause of this complaint is ¿manufacturing process design¿, since the design or validation of the manufacturing process was not sufficient to ensure the finished device met the intent of the design.There is an investigation in place to address this issue.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and no deviations were found.A search of the complaint database revealed that no other complaints exist for the specified lot.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an rx cytology brush was used in an unknown procedure performed on (b)(6) 2018.According to the complainant, during preparation, the brush failed to retract, and the bristled portion of the brush was noted to be bent.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Type of Device
ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key7293915
MDR Text Key101010134
Report Number3005099803-2018-00362
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDX
UDI-Device Identifier08714729268628
UDI-Public08714729268628
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFI
PMA/PMN Number
K930348
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/29/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/23/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/06/2019
Device Model NumberM00545000
Device Catalogue Number4500
Device Lot Number21346931
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/09/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/01/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/06/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-