• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GENZYME BIOSURGERY (RIDGEFIELD) SYNVISC (SYNVISC); INTRA-ARTICULAR HYALURONIC ACID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GENZYME BIOSURGERY (RIDGEFIELD) SYNVISC (SYNVISC); INTRA-ARTICULAR HYALURONIC ACID Back to Search Results
Lot Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Rash (2033)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This unsolicited case from (b)(6) was received on 05-mar-2018 from the health care professional (pharmacist).This case concerns a male patient with unspecified age who received treatment with synvisc injection and after 2 weeks the patient experienced bad rash and blister like rash/ rash started at his legs then spread to his whole body.No relevant medical history, past drugs and concurrent condition was reported.Patient had no known allergies.The patient was taking paracetamol (panadol osteo) and duloxetine hydrochloride (cymbalta) long term.On an unknown date, the patient received treatment with intra-articular synvisc injection (dose, frequency, indication, lot number and expiration date: not reported).On an unknown date, 2 weeks after receiving the injection, the patient developed a bad rash and a blister-like rash.The rash started at his legs then spread to his whole body.Eighteen (18) months later the patient still experienced the rash with attacks of it 'now and then.Patient was using unspecified corticosteroids at treatment.Action taken: unknown.Corrective treatment: unspecified corticosteroid.Outcome: unknown.A pharmaceutical technical complaint (ptc) was initiated and results were pending for the same.Seriousness criterion: required intervention.No further information was provided.Consent to contact for follow-up was given.Pharmacovigilance comment: sanofi company comment dated 6-mar-2018: this case concerns a patient who received treatment with synvisc and after two weeks experienced rash.Since a significant temporal relationship can be established the causal role of suspect product cannot be denied in occurrence of the event.However, due to lack of information regarding medical history, concurrent condition and past drugs complete medical assessment of the case is difficult.
 
Event Description
This unsolicited case from australia was received from the health care professional (pharmacist).This case concerns a male patient with unspecified age who received treatment with synvisc injection and after 2 weeks the patient experienced bad rash and blister like rash/ rash started at his legs then spread to his whole body.No relevant medical history, past drugs and concurrent condition was reported.Patient had no known allergies.The patient was taking paracetamol (panadol osteo) and duloxetine hydrochloride (cymbalta) long term.On an unknown date, the patient received treatment with intra-articular synvisc injection (dose, frequency, indication, lot number and expiration date: not reported).On an unknown date, 2 weeks after receiving the injection, the patient developed a bad rash and a blister-like rash.The rash started at his legs then spread to his whole body.18 months later the patient still experienced the rash with attacks of it 'now and then.Patient was using unspecified corticosteroids at treatment.Action taken: unknown.Corrective treatment: unspecified corticosteroid.Outcome: unknown.A pharmaceutical technical complaint (ptc) was initiated and results were pending for the same.Seriousness criterion: required intervention.No further information was provided.Consent to contact for follow-up was given.Pharmacovigilance comment: sanofi company comment dated 6-mar-2018: this case concerns a patient who received treatment with synvisc and after two weeks experienced rash.Since a significant temporal relationship can be established the causal role of suspect product cannot be denied in occurrence of the event.However, due to lack of information regarding medical history, concurrent condition and past drugs complete medical assessment of the case is difficult.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNVISC (SYNVISC)
Type of Device
INTRA-ARTICULAR HYALURONIC ACID
Manufacturer (Section D)
GENZYME BIOSURGERY (RIDGEFIELD)
1125 pleadantview terrace
ridgefield NJ 07657
MDR Report Key7334183
MDR Text Key102222145
Report Number2246315-2018-00379
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MOZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P940015
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/05/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Other
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/05/2018
Initial Date FDA Received03/13/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/08/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/21/2018
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
CYMBALTA(CON.).; CYMBALTA(CON.).; PANADOL OSTEO(CON.).; PANADOL OSTEO(CON.).; CYMBALTA(CON.); PANADOL OSTEO(CON.)
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-