A customer from (b)(6) reported a misidentification of a streptococcus mitis quality control sample ((b)(6)) in association with the vitek® 2 gp test kit.The customer reported the lyophilized specimen was subbed out twice (as required by (b)(6)), before any testing was done on the isolate.The customer performed offline biochemical testing and the results were: pyr-, lap+, esc-, opt-resistant, bile solubility-r, alpha colonies and gpc in chains.A biomérieux internal investigation will be initiated.
|
A customer from canada reported a misidentification of a streptococcus mitis quality control sample (iqmh) in association with the vitek® 2 gp test kit.An investigation was performed.The customer's submitted strain was subcultured to tsab agar and two different colony morphologies were observed, a larger and a smaller colony, both alpha-hemolytic and testing was performed on both colony types.Testing included individual organism suspensions with gp cards from the customer's lot (2420409403) and a random lot (2420542103), vitek ms and api 20 strep kit.Note: both colony types were very dry and flaky and suspensions remained very particulate rather than the recommended homogenous inoculum.A total of six gp cards were tested, resulting in identifications of s.Mitis/s.Oralis (slashline) on one card, low discrimination: s.Mitis/s.Oralis/s sanguinis on two cards, low discrimination: s.Mitis/s.Oralis/s.Pneumoniae on one card, and unidentified organism on two cards.While the slashline and low discrimination identifications are considered correct, the customer's unidentified organism results were duplicated.A review of the customer's streptococcus thoraltensis reactions demonstrated five atypical positive reactions (amy, dxyl, dman, mbdg, dtre) for an identification of s.Mitis according to the gp knowledge base.A review of the customer's streptococcus pneumoniae reactions demonstrated four atypical positive reactions (amy, sal, pyra, dtre) for an identification of s.Mitis according to the gp knowledge base.A review of the customer's gemella morbillorum reactions demonstrated three atypical negative reactions (leua, dgal, sac) for an identification of s.Mitis according to the gp knowledge base.A review of the customer's three unidentified organism reports demonstrated three (pyra, sal, dtre) seven (amy, dxyl, pyra, dman, mbdg, sal, dtre) and four (dman, mbdg, sal, dtre) atypical positive reactions for an identification of s.Mitis according to the gp knowledge base.An increased number of atypical positive reactions can indicate contamination, mixed culture, use of non-recommended media or other user set up errors or an atypical strain.An increased number of atypical negative results can indicate a strain with decreased viability, user set up error or an atypical strain.The investigation concluded the submitted isolate has an atypical biochemical profile.
|