• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMÉRIEUX, INC. VITEK® 2 GRAM-POSITIVE (GP) IDENTIFICATION (ID) TEST KIT; VITEK® 2 GP ID CARD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMÉRIEUX, INC. VITEK® 2 GRAM-POSITIVE (GP) IDENTIFICATION (ID) TEST KIT; VITEK® 2 GP ID CARD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 21342
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
A customer from (b)(6) contacted biomérieux to report the occurrence of misidentification of listeria monocytogenes atcc 19111 and nctc 7973 in association with the vitek® 2 gp id test kit.Though not qc strains recommended by biomérieux, the customer has internal requirements to test atcc 19111 and nctc 7973 strains.The customer cultivates the strains, into fraser-broth (enrichment) or uvm main-enrichment broth and perform sub-culture on hand-made tsab or horse blood agar, incubate for 24 hours at 35-37°c with co2.This hand-made media is neither recommended nor validated for use by biomérieux, constituting off-label use by the customer.Follow-up testing by the customer using approved tsab media obtained a result of listeria innocua.There is no indication or report from the laboratory that the discrepant result led to any adverse event related to any patient's state of health.There was no patient directly associated with the qc strains.Culture submittal was requested by biomérieux for internal investigation.Biomérieux investigation has been initiated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A customer from (b)(6) contacted biomérieux to report the occurrence of misidentification of listeria monocytogenes atcc 19111 and nctc 7973 in association with the vitek® 2 gp id test kit.An investigation was performed.The intended identification to listeria monocytogenes was confirmed on vitek ms v3 (knowledge base v3.0) for both strains.On vitek 2 (v7.01) gp cards, one card of the customer lot (2420573103), one card of customer lot (2420457403) and one card of a random lot (2420571103) were tested from tsab subculture.These tests gave an excellent identification to l.Monocytogenes (99%) whatever the lots and the strain tested.The customer misidentification was not duplicated in-house.The only difference observed between biomerieux and customer results is the piplc test result (= discriminant test) that was negative on the vitek 2 customer results, which could explain the misidentification.The vitek 2 gp card performed as intended in house and no further action is required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITEK® 2 GRAM-POSITIVE (GP) IDENTIFICATION (ID) TEST KIT
Type of Device
VITEK® 2 GP ID CARD
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMÉRIEUX, INC.
595 anglum road
hazelwood MO 63042
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMÉRIEUX, INC.
595 anglum road
hazelwood MO 63042
Manufacturer Contact
ellen weltmer
595 anglum road
hazelwood, MO 63042
3147317301
MDR Report Key7346558
MDR Text Key103162376
Report Number1950204-2018-00106
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQL
UDI-Device Identifier03573026131920
UDI-Public03573026131920
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
CL. I EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/27/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/16/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/22/2019
Device Catalogue Number21342
Device Lot Number2420573103
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/07/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/21/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-