• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG LIFESTENT SOLO VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG LIFESTENT SOLO VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number EX062003CL
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Difficult to Remove (1528); Misfire (2532)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 02/21/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Images were provided to the manufacturer and are being reviewed.The lot number for the device was provided.The device history records are currently under review.The device has been returned for evaluation.The investigation is currently underway.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a peripheral leg case to treat the femoral artery via a contralateral approach, the vascular stent allegedly fractured and a segment remained in the patient.Therefore, another manufacturer's stent was used to press the segment against the vessel wall.It was further reported that upon removal, the guidewire became allegedly stuck with the catheter.So, the guidewire and the catheter were removed as one unit.However, access was not lost as the introducer sheath remained in place.Reportedly, the procedure was completed, and the patient is doing well.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a peripheral leg case to treat the femoral artery via a contralateral approach, the vascular stent allegedly fractured and a segment remained in the patient.Therefore, another manufacturer's stent was used to press the segment against the vessel wall.It was further reported that upon removal, the guidewire became allegedly stuck with the catheter.So, the guidewire and the catheter were removed as one unit.However, access was not lost as the introducer sheath remained in place.Reportedly, the procedure was completed, and the patient is doing well.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: the lot number has been provided and the lot device history records have been reviewed.The lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only complaint reported for this lot number and issue to date.Investigation summary: based on the investigation of the returned catheter sample and the provided images it was confirmed that the user actively used the deployment system and that the system could only partially deploy the stent which resulted in stent fractured upon removal.Furthermore, the guidewire was found stuck inside the system, as alleged.A force transmitting component was found fractured at the distal end which confirmed high release force, and which made a complete deployment of the stent impossible.Excessive release force during stent deployment was considered as reason for partial stent deployment and subsequent stent fracture upon removal.Difficult patient anatomy or challenging placement site may lead to friction increase and deployment failure.In this case the tracking vessel was reported as tortuous, and calcification was visible on the images provided.The lesion was pre dilated and difficulty advancing to the lesion site was not experienced.The stuck guidewire was considered a consequence of high deployment force leading to lumen deformation (catheter pig tail like deformed) and subsequent patency reduction.Based on the information available, and the evaluation of the returned catheter sample, a definite root cause could not be identified.Labeling review: in reviewing the applicable labeling for this product it was found that the instructions for use (ifu) sufficiently address the potential risks.The ifu states: 'do not constrict the delivery system during stent deployment.If excessive force is felt during stent deployment, do not force the stent system.Remove the stent system and replace with a new unit.' the ifu further states: 'if resistance is met while retracting the delivery system over a guidewire, remove the delivery system and guidewire together.' and 'examine the stent system for any damage.If it is suspected that the sterility or performance of the stent system has been compromised, the device must not be used.'.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LIFESTENT SOLO VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
VASCULAR STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG
wachhausstrasse 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM  76227
MDR Report Key7351327
MDR Text Key102865023
Report Number9681442-2018-00038
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
UDI-Device Identifier04049519004303
UDI-Public(01)04049519004303
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P070014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/26/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/13/2019
Device Model NumberEX062003CL
Device Catalogue NumberEX062003CL
Device Lot NumberANBR1701
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/12/2018
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/21/2018
Initial Date FDA Received03/19/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/20/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/26/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age84 YR
Patient Weight73
-
-