ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V. CARELINE AIRLESS STANDARD PRE-PUMP BLOOD; SET, TUBING, BLOOD, WITH AND WITHOUT ANTI-REGURGITATION VALVE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 03-4200-6 |
Device Problem
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 03/20/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity. .
|
|
Event Description
|
A user facility biomedical technician (biomed) reported a blood leak from the bloodline that occurred at the beginning of the patient¿s hemodialysis (hd) treatment.Per the biomed, the blood leak was coming from the bloodline itself, and not at a connection to another product.The patient's estimated blood loss (ebl) was approximately 250 ml.There was no patient injury, adverse events, or medical intervention required as a result of this event.The patient was restarted on a new machine and treatment completed successfully with new supplies.The complaint device was reported to be available to be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluation: the actual sample was returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.A simulated use test was performed on the sample for four hours.During the period tested no air bubbles inside the system was noticed, no leaks, no level variation of arterial and venous chamber, or any alarm.No leaks were observed in the pod from the diaphragm to the monitor line.The sample tested worked as intended without any abnormalities during the tested period.The diaphragm seal in the pod was tested for leaks and none were observed.In addition, the diaphragm was removed from the pod assembly on the venous and arterial lines and tested with acceptable results in both the pressure drop test and underwater leak test.An investigation of the device history records (dhr) was conducted by the manufacturer.There were no nonconformances or abnormalities identified during the manufacturing process which could be associated with the reported event.In addition, the dhr review confirmed the results of the in-progress and final quality control (qc) testing met all requirements.The complaint device performed as designed and an associated cause could not be determined and the alleged failure was not confirmed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|