• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC FILIFORM DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC FILIFORM DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number G15146
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/02/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the filiform double pigtail ureteral stent set broke during the stent retrieval procedure and the user used forceps to retrieve the broken piece of the stent immediately.The stent had been implanted for around 2.5 months in the patient.It was reported that the product will not be returned as it was discarded.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Investigation ¿ evaluation: the device was not returned and there were no photos of the complaint product were provided.There were no additional product sets remaining of the same lot consequently a physical product investigation could not be carried out.A review of complaint history, the device history record, quality control data, and specifications was performed.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history revealed one other complaint associated with lot number 8211194.The second complaint was from the same facility and for the same failure mode.A document review did not identify any anomalies with the manufacturing process or any non-conformances.The tubing used for the stent is supplied with tensile test data that indicated it met specification.Raw material incoming inspection also carried out tensile testing on the same material.The data was reviewed for the complaint lot and found to meet specification.Based on the provided information a definitive cause of the alleged complaint issue cannot be determined.Measures have been initiated to address the reported failure mode.Cook medical has notified the appropriate personnel and will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Investigation ¿ evaluation: the device was not returned and there were no photos of the complaint product were provided.There were no additional product sets remaining of the same lot consequently a physical product investigation could not be carried out.A review of complaint history, the device history record, quality control data, and specifications was performed.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history revealed one other complaint associated with lot number 8211194.The second complaint was from the same facility and for the same failure mode.A document review did not identify any anomalies with the manufacturing process or any non-conformances.The tubing used for the stent is supplied with tensile test data that indicated it met specification.Raw material incoming inspection also carried out tensile testing on the same material.The data was reviewed for the complaint lot and found to meet specification.Based on the provided information a definitive cause of the alleged complaint issue cannot be determined.Measures have been initiated to address the reported failure mode.Cook medical has notified the appropriate personnel and will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FILIFORM DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET
Type of Device
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
MDR Report Key7438598
MDR Text Key105751545
Report Number1820334-2018-00954
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
UDI-Device Identifier00827002151468
UDI-Public(01)00827002151468(17)200912(10)8211194
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,foreign,health profe
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/01/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberG15146
Device Catalogue Number133626
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/30/2018
Initial Date FDA Received04/17/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/24/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/01/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-