The product was disposed of by the hospital and is no longer available for return.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2018-00382, 3005168196-2018-00383, 3005168196-2018-00384.The hospital discarded the device.
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the left internal iliac artery using ruby coils and pod6.During the procedure, while attempting to place a ruby coil between the arterial and venous connection in a figure 8 fashion using a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern), the physician aggressively applied forward tension on the lantern and moved the coil in and out the treatment site.Consequently, the pusher assembly pet lock became damaged and subsequently, the ruby coil unintentionally detached.Therefore, the physician attached a syringe to the back of the lantern and pulled negative pressure back.Thus, the detached coil was aspirated out.It was reported that the same issue occurred with another ruby coil and pod6.Both coils were also aspirated out after the unintentional detachment.While attempting to advance a new ruby coil through the lantern, the ruby coil pusher assembly became bent and kinked after aggressive forward and backward motion.Therefore, the ruby coil and lantern were removed.The procedure was completed using a new lantern and additional ruby coils.It should be noted that there was no noted damage or issue with the initial lantern.The physician just wanted to start fresh with a new lantern.Additionally, there was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|