It was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed due to pain and other complications.As of today, device return and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.The device batch/lot details have not been received therefor no thorough manufacturing record review and assessment of the reported event can be performed.The available medical documents were reviewed.According to the provided implant report, the stem was placed 2 to 3 mm deeper than the neck cut.According to the provided revision report, there was a large amount of fluid below the fascia and extracapsular within the pseudocapsule.The diagnosis was metallosis with lysis and greater trochanter fracture.The latter was treated with an internal fixation.The morse taper was described in good condition and the stem remained in-vivo.Whether there is a relation between placing the stem deeper than the neck cut and the reported finding cannot be assessed based on the provided information.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|
It was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision, the bhr cup, hemi head and modular sleeve were removed.The anthology stem remained implanted.As of today, device return and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.The available medical documents were reviewed.The intraoperative findings of metallosis, osteolysis, and elevated metal ions are consistent with findings associated with metal debris.The patient¿s history of both dysplastic hip syndrome and chronic steroid injections, may have been a contributing factor in her poor bone quality.Without all supporting lab/pathology results, imaging, and/or the analysis of the explanted components, the source of the reported clinical reactions cannot be confirmed, and it cannot be concluded that they were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.Additionally, the use of a zimmer acetabular component with a smith + nephew implant, which is contraindicated, and cannot be ruled out as a contributing factor.It cannot be concluded that the reported reactions/events were associated with a mal-performance of the smith + nephew implant.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|