• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. POD PACKING COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. POD PACKING COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBYPODJ60
Device Problems Failure to Advance (2524); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/27/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2018-00869.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure to treat an endoleak using a pod packing coil (podj).During the procedure, the physician advanced a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern) in the endoleak using a needle and placed a ruby coil in the target vessel.While attempting to advance a podj through the lantern, the podj became stuck inside the lantern and could not be pushed forward; therefore, the lantern and podj were removed together.The procedure was completed using a non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and a non-penumbra microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly and an unknown material was on the pusher assembly.The pusher assembly was kinked approximately 82.0 cm from the proximal end.The embolization coil was intact with its pusher assembly.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned podj revealed that the device could be advanced through a microcatheter.During the functional test, the podj was advanced through a demonstration microcatheter and out of the distal tip without an issue.The root cause of the podj getting stuck inside the microcatheter during the procedure could not be determined.The foreign material found on the podj pusher assembly could not be identified.The lantern identified in the complaint was not returned to penumbra for evaluation.Penumbra coils and catheters are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POD PACKING COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key7466319
MDR Text Key106719925
Report Number3005168196-2018-00868
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548016733
UDI-Public00814548016733
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K170852
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,03/27/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Catalogue NumberRBYPODJ60
Device Lot NumberF81316
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/09/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/27/2018
Initial Date FDA Received04/26/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/15/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/23/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/05/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age28 YR
-
-