|
Catalog Number RBYPODJ60 |
Device Problems
Failure to Advance (2524); Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 03/27/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2018-00869.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure to treat an endoleak using a pod packing coil (podj).During the procedure, the physician advanced a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern) in the endoleak using a needle and placed a ruby coil in the target vessel.While attempting to advance a podj through the lantern, the podj became stuck inside the lantern and could not be pushed forward; therefore, the lantern and podj were removed together.The procedure was completed using a non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and a non-penumbra microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly and an unknown material was on the pusher assembly.The pusher assembly was kinked approximately 82.0 cm from the proximal end.The embolization coil was intact with its pusher assembly.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned podj revealed that the device could be advanced through a microcatheter.During the functional test, the podj was advanced through a demonstration microcatheter and out of the distal tip without an issue.The root cause of the podj getting stuck inside the microcatheter during the procedure could not be determined.The foreign material found on the podj pusher assembly could not be identified.The lantern identified in the complaint was not returned to penumbra for evaluation.Penumbra coils and catheters are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|