A biomérieux internal investigation was performed.* investigation findings: =>system was operational during tests performed (fine tuning acceptance criteria were conformed).=>based on the analysis of the results obtained from calibrator spots, the "all peaks number" is quite homogeneous.The sample spot preparation was good.* results interpretation: =>regarding the information provided, the most probable identification is salmonella typhi.=> vitek ms gave salmonella group instead of the suspected identification to the species level salmonella typhi.In this case, as described in the vitek ms v3.0 knowledge base clinical use 161150-556 - b, for salmonella group and all salmonella identifications, you have to : - handle isolate with extreme caution and send to a reference laboratory for identification confirmation following your laboratory's protocol and/or country regulations.- confirm identification by serological tests.* probable cause: =>limitation of the knowledge base v3.0 clinical regarding salmonella.
|
A customer in (b)(6) reported a twice misidentified salmonella ser typhi strain from blood culture, as salmonella group in association with the vitek® ms instrument on (b)(6) 2018.The customer stated the serological test result was not consistent with the vitek ms, so the isolate was tested with the vitek 2 gn card which identified salmonella ser typhi.The customer stated they subcultured the positive cultures on bap, mac and tsi slant, and the tsi indicated s.Typhi.The customer indicated that there was no incorrect result reported, and no reporting delay or impact to patient therapy.There is no indication or report from the hospital or treating physician to biomérieux that the discrepant result led to any adverse event related to the patient's state of health.
|