• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Human-Device Interface Problem (2949)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/04/2012
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a consumer regarding a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for gastrointestinal/pelvic floor.It was reported that the patient was confused about terms and it was not clear whether the patient was referring to the ins or patient programmer.The patient reported they had 2 stimulators, meaning programmers, because the first one did not work right and they had sent them another one.They were both the same model, but had different numbers on the back.Patient was calling to make sure they were using the correct one.It was reviewed she could use either programmer and not break anything.Patient was asked to explain what did not work right with their first one and they stated they had all kinds of trouble getting it implanted.They stated your equipment did not work at all and they had to call the patient back and start all over again.It took a long time to even get one implanted.Since then they had ended up with 2 programmers.When asked to clarify which equipment didn't work the patient stated the first time they went in for surgery they put the whole thing in and nothing happened.When the patient got home, they got a call stating it was not them, it was the problem with the equipment.They then started over again.They further explained that on the day of implant there was something wrong with the piece of equipment they were using, patient guessed it was the implant.It took about 1.5 years to finally get one working.Patient was asked if they replaced the ins or the patient programmer, patient stated they still had it, meaning the patient programmer.It was replaced in 2014.When asked again which was not working, the patient stated the programmer.At the implant surgery, their healthcare provider told them they could start over.No patient symptoms were reported.No further complications were reported or anticipated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7493795
MDR Text Key107568234
Report Number3004209178-2018-10327
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/08/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/08/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2014
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/03/2018
Date Device Manufactured09/05/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age88 YR
-
-