Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.A device history record review was requested.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Part 319.006, lot 7314375: release to warehouse date: march 20, 2013.Manufactured by synthes (b)(4).No non-conformance reports (ncrs) were generated during production.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any subcomponents, which would contribute to this complaint condition.A product investigation was completed: visual inspection observed that needle of the depth gauge broke at its connection to the body of the depth gauge.The broken off portion was not returned.However, the protection sleeve component of the depth gauge was not returned.The received condition agrees with the complaint description.The returned depth gauge was manufactured in november 2013 and is over four (4) years old.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The material and relevant material properties were determined to be conforming at the time of manufacture based on review of the device history record.Relevant drawings for the returned device were reviewed and determined to be suitable for the intended design and application when used as recommended.A dimensional inspection of features relevant to the broken needle could not be obtained because it was not returned.While no definitive root cause could be determined it is possible that the 4+ year old device encountered unintended forces such as being dropped or damaged during usage or handling leading to the broken needle portion and may have been lost during sterile processing.During the investigation, no product design or manufacturing issues were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|