• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS; NIP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS; NIP Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PAHR060502E
Device Problems Break (1069); Entrapment of Device (1212)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 04/24/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The review of the manufacturing records verified that this lot met all pre-release specifications.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The patient presented with a thrombosed bypass within the superficial femoral artery / popliteal artery which was intended to be treated with a gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis.It was reported to gore that the endoprosthesis was successfully deployed at the distal end of the bypass without any abnormalities recognized.It was sated that when the delivery catheter was removed through the introducer sheath, a visual inspection indicated that the catheter shaft was broken and that the distal part of the device remained in the patient.An attempt was made to move the separated catheter shaft with the support of a balloon to the proximal end of the bypass.As further retraction of the catheter was not possible, an incision was made through the bypass to withdraw the catheter from the patient.It was reported that during this attempt the catheter was also cut into two pieces.After successfully device retrieval the bypass was sutured again and the procedure was completed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Device evaluation: our engineers have evaluated the returned device where the following observations were made: the deployment line and knob as well as the delivery catheter were returned.The endoprosthesis was not returned.The deployment line was fully intact and measured 151 cm long.The delivery catheter was returned in three pieces: dual lumen catheter bonded to the hub, transition bonded to some of the distal shaft (upon which the endoprosthesis was mounted), and the remainder of the distal shaft with the bonded distal tip.The dual lumen did not appear to have been melted to the transition.Part of the distal shaft, which sits inside the dual lumen catheter, also did not appear to have been melted, however, the distal shaft was melted to the transition.This part of the distal shaft was 0.5 cm.The opening where the deployment line enters the transition appeared to be melted.The other side of the distal shaft appeared to be cut and extended 0.3 cm past the transition.The remainder of the distal shaft with the bonded distal tip was 4.3 cm.The remainder of the device appeared unremarkable.Based on the device examination performed, manufacturing anomalies were identified that potentially could have contributed to the event.Further investigation and evaluation contained in failure investigation report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
NIP
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
MDR Report Key7543648
MDR Text Key109760088
Report Number2017233-2018-00302
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PFV
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P130006
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/10/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/16/2020
Device Catalogue NumberPAHR060502E
Device Lot Number17274524
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/16/2018
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received05/25/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/04/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-