• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK JETSTREAM® XC ATHERECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK JETSTREAM® XC ATHERECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number 112266-001
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/02/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr: returned product consisted of a jetstream xc-2.4 atherectomy catheter in one piece.The guidewire lumen and the catheter shaft were checked for damage.The baton and part of the aspiration tubing were cut from the device by the customer site before returning.The guidewire was not returned with the device.The device showed a severe kink in the catheter shaft approximately 23cm from the tip.A.014 test guidewire was inserted into the device and traveled as far as the kink that was noticed in the device and stopped.The kink would be consistent with the customer feeling a restriction or an indication of a guidewire sticking issue.The most likely cause of the kink was pushing, pulling and torqueing of the device.The device could not be functionally tested due to the damage.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.The investigation conclusion is operational context as the product meets the design & manufacture specification but due to anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure, performance was limited.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported the catheter became stuck on the wire and the device stopped spinning during the procedure.A 2.4mm jetstream® xc atherectomy catheter and an unspecified guidewire were selected for an atherectomy procedure.During the procedure, the jetstream device stopped spinning and became stuck on the wire.The catheter and wire were removed from the patient.There were no patient complications.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was further reported that the target lesion was located in the distal superficial femoral artery (sfa).The jetstream device would not work, aspirate or spin.A non-bsc wire was used.The procedure was completed with balloon angioplasty.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
JETSTREAM® XC ATHERECTOMY CATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key7544162
MDR Text Key109235655
Report Number2134265-2018-04540
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K130637
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/02/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/25/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/16/2020
Device Model Number112266-001
Device Catalogue NumberPV41340
Device Lot Number0021748951
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/08/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/30/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/15/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-