Same case as mdr id: 2134265-2018-05320.It was reported that tip detachment occurred.The 100% stenosed target lesion was located in the moderately tortuous and mildly calcified left common iliac artery and the thrombosed previously placed wallstent in the external iliac artery (eia).The wallstent of eia and blood vessel were tortuous to an unbelievable extent.A non-bsc guide wire was advanced via right femoral approach but failed to cross.The device was then advanced via left femoral but it was still unable to cross.Subsequently, with the aid of a non-bsc sheath, the wire was advanced via left brachial but still failed.Approach was performed again via left femoral and the guide wire was able to cross.A 3mm-20mm sterling balloon catheter was advanced for pre-dilatation.Following plain old balloon angioplasty with a 6mm-60mm sterling balloon catheter, a 8x100x75 epic¿ vascular stent was placed.Upon removing the stent delivery system (sds) post-deployment, resistance was encountered.When the device was pulled, a snapping sound was heard.The sds was removed, however; it was noticed that the tip got detached and the detached fragment could not be found.The physician attempted to perform post-dilatation with a 6mm-60mm sterling balloon catheter but it failed to cross the sheath.The sheath was replaced with a 6fr-10cm non-bsc sheath, however; the balloon catheter still failed to cross.The procedure was completed and no further patient complications were reported.
|
Describe event or problem, device evaluated by mfr., eval summary, method codes, result codes, conclusion codes updated.Device evaluated by mfr.: returned product consisted of an epic self-expanding stent system.The outer sheath, tip, inner sheath and the remainder of the device were checked for damage.The inner liner was detached and the tip was missing.The inner liner that was remaining showed kinks from the distal end of the markerband.The inner liner distal end damage looks like there may have been some tensile force applied due to the way the inner liner appears to be damaged and stretched.There may also have been interference with the introducer sheath that may have caused the separation.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.The investigation conclusion is user / use error as there was an act or omission of an act that resulted in a different medical device response than intended by the manufacturer or expected by the user.The epic dfu states: use caution when withdrawing the stent delivery system and always manipulate under fluoroscopy.If unusual resistance is felt, re-advance and rotate the delivery system to center the delivery system within the vessel, then carefully attempt repeat withdrawal.(b)(4).
|